Diversifying Into Global Bonds and Currencies


By M. Isi Eromosele

Global investors, particularly those in the U.S. have expressed increasing concern about the stability of their own domestic markets. Over the last two years, investors have worried about the de-basing of their domestic currency, the credit quality of their “risk-free” bond market and what will happen when their Central Banks start to tighten monetary policy.

Investors can diversify their currency and interest rate risk by going global, and start expanding the horizons of their investment universe. The concerns of U.S. investors can also be applied to Europe, the UK and Japan.

When adopting a global approach to fixed income, investors probably should not follow bond indices. Bond indices are based on market capitalization; so the greater the volume of issuance, the heavier the index weighting.

The bond index investor is therefore forced to buy increasing amounts of the bonds of those countries that are issuing large volumes of debt and is thereby locked into those countries’ declining credit story. Is there a better way?




In measuring bond value, investors ignore the power of the yield curve at their peril. Compared to cash rates, longer-dated bonds are historically cheap. Absolute yield levels are low, but this a reflection of the current low cash rates. Inflation and other assets (equities) may provide a useful measure when global concerns begin to subside.

Commodity price inflation has been a further concern for investors during the early part of the year. Moving into the second half of 2012, however, these inflation expectations subsided.

The year-on-year effects are such that yearly headline inflation statistics will likely be in decline. In the absence of a complete collapse in the European periphery, lower inflation expectations, together with Japan’s return to normal should allow economic growth forecasts to rise once more.

Eventually current concerns might subside, which would lead to rising expectations of tighter monetary policy and in turn raise questions about how best to diversify current safe haven assets.

From that perspective, worries about declining credit quality and the potential for higher cash rates could eventually be applied to most developed markets and each country would love to see its currency decline in value.

The traditional global government bond indices are dominated by such markets; the U.S. Dollar, European Euro and the Japanese Yen make up just under 90% of global government bond indices.

When seeking to diversify away from these markets, one must look for better credit quality, where higher official rates are already priced in and a currency that has potential to rally.

Many developing markets fit this description, but their local markets are generally, small, and subject to manipulation. There are also a number of developed markets (Australia, Sweden, Norway, Canada, Switzerland and Denmark) that could also be placed within this category.

The weightings of these markets in bond indices are small or non-existent but their liquidity is more than sufficient for inclusion and their share of world GDP or currency trade puts them in the top 30 countries.

If the net is widened to include investment-grade developing markets such as the BRICs (excluding India), South Korea, Mexico, Poland, Malaysia, Singapore and the Czech Republic, the pool expands to encompass a truly global universe, which provides investors greater opportunity to diversify interest rate, credit and currency risk.

Bonds and currencies are driven by monetary and fiscal policies which, since the global credit crisis, have diverged greatly. Those countries that are not encumbered by legacy debt issues have raised interest rates and kept their government balance sheets clean.

The resultant tightening of monetary policy in those countries, such as Australia leaves them with attractive bond yields and greater fiscal credibility. Those countries that must work through their debt problems will likely continue to finance their rebuilding through ultra-low rates and steep yield curves.

A diversified exposure to these different themes is an exciting way to reduce domestic risk.

M. Isi Eromosele is the President | Chief Executive Officer | Executive Creative Director of Oseme Group - Oseme Creative | Oseme Consulting | Oseme Finance
Copyright Control © 2012 Oseme Group

0 comments:

Copyright 2010 - 2013 © Oseme Finance
&